Articles

These pieces sit between research, fieldwork, and governance.

They are written for people who have to turn complex, often conflicting inputs into decisions that affect teachers, neurodivergent families, learners, and staff, and who need something more useful than generic AI narratives.

This is a growing library of how I think about AI, evidence, workload, and governance in practice: how I read research, how I treat frontline accounts, and how I frame options and risk when the decision in front of you is real rather than hypothetical.

Three starting points

A quick way into the library, depending on the kind of decision or concern you are carrying.

How to use this library

If you come from evaluation or programme work, start with the teacher workload piece. If governance and risk are your immediate concern, start with Held Moments.

All three are written so you can lift language and framing directly into your own briefs, internal notes, or board papers.

These articles are also the clearest way to see how I think before commissioning anything. In that sense, they are the public version of a scoping conversation.

All published pieces

As the library grows, all essays and judgement notes will appear here.

What happens after reading

Use the library as a starting point, not the whole conversation

If a piece here connects directly to a decision you are holding, the next step is usually to visit the Studio page to see how the work is structured, or go straight to Contact if you already know the decision or governance moment you need help with.